Weak Link in Government Security: Security Clearances Dependant on Profit-Oriented Deadlines
Companies performing security background checks for the U.S. government continue to operate on a piecework basis with their investigators, often causing them to sacrifice thoroughness for expediency.
One contractor, USIS, spent years rushing through investigations of government employees seeking security clearances. Company officials said they had little choice but to speed through the reviews because their payments from the government were linked to how many investigations they performed. USIS lost its contract after an employee filed a suit, eventually joined by the Justice Department, about the company’s practices.
Both contractors demand their investigators meet daily quotas and their pay continues to be based on the number of investigations completed. The companies do this because it’s the same way they’re paid by the federal government, complete with financial penalties for missing deadlines.
The government agency in charge of the process claimed to be unaware that the investigators’ pay was tied to the number of cases they cleared. “Candidly, that has not been brought to my attention,” Merton Miller, the associate director for the Office of Personnel Management’s Federal Investigative Services, told the Post.
Carolyn Martin, president of the American Federal Contract Investigators Association, a professional group, told the Post the system is “just producing shoddy investigations.”
“They are out there getting the points. They are not conducting investigations,” Martin said.
An investigator who had worked for both USIS and KeyPoint said: “It was just too rushed. I couldn’t in good conscience continue. I refused to cut corners, and it made me look like I couldn’t perform to their unreasonable expectations.”
There are also problems at the Transportation Security Administration. A report (pdf) by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general found that the airports, which perform background checks for aviation workers, sometimes had incomplete information on applicants. Some who got through the process didn’t even have permission to work in the United States.
-Noel Brinkerhoff, Steve Straehley
To Learn More:
Even after Snowden, Quota System on Background Checks May Be Imperiling U.S. Secrets (by Christian Davenport, Washington Post)
TSA Can Improve Aviation Worker Vetting (Redacted) (Department of Homeland Security Inspector General) (pdf)
The Number of People with Security Clearances Drops by 12%, but 1.2 Million Still have Top Secret Access (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Background Check Companies Working for Government Still Doing Amateurish Jobs (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
U.S. Charges with Fraud the Security Firm that Approved Snowden and Navy Yard Murderer (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Secretary of Agriculture: Who Is Sonny Perdue?
- Acting Director of the U.S. National Central Bureau of INTERPOL: Who is Wayne Salzgaber?
- Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Who Is Thomas Homan?
- Acting Director of the U.S. Marshals Service: Who Is David Harlow?
- U.S. Ambassador to Italy: Who Is Lewis Eisenberg?