Killing Arab Dictators: Bush vs. Obama

Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Saddam or Gaddafi, who cost the United States more? It’s not much of a comparison, in terms of dollars or casualties for Americans.
 
President George W. Bush’s decision to invade to Iraq in 2003—first to eliminate non-existent weapons of mass destruction, then to take out Saddam Hussein—drained more than $800 billion in military spending alone from the U.S. Treasury over a period of more than eight years. It has also killed 4,479 American soldiers and wounded another 30,182. In addition, 468 U.S. contractors have died in Iraq.
 
President Barack Obama’s move to help oust Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi only required four months, during which the Department of Defense spent $1.1 billion. The conflict did not kill or wound any American troops, since none were deployed to fight. Two U.S. journalists did die in Libya. Photographers Chris Hondros and Tim Hetherington (dual U.S.-U.K. citizenship) were killed by Gaddafi’s forces on April 20.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 

Who is Muammar al-Gaddafi? (by David Wallechinsky, AllGov) 

Comments

Javier Odom 12 years ago
sadly, this is article takes a very ignorant perspective.
midas360 12 years ago
you are comparing apples to oranges when it comes to population, size of army, and location of population.

Leave a comment