Replace “Cap and Trade” with “Fee and Dividend”: James Hansen

Saturday, January 02, 2010

Solving the problem of global warming requires discarding the cap-and-trade policy currently popular with public officials and going instead with something called fee-and-dividend, says scientist James Hansen, the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. With cap-and-trade, the government hopes to “cap” the amount of fossil fuels available for sale, requiring businesses to trade coal or oil and in the process drive up prices to ultimately limit the output of harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Companies that want to pollute above their limit can buy pollution credits from companies that pollute less.

 
Hansen argues that cap-and-trade is primarily good for the energy companies “with strong lobbyists and for Congress, which would get to dole out the money collected in certificate selling, or just give away some certificates to special interests.”
 
With fee-and-dividend, fees are assessed on fossil fuels when they are first sold or extracted from the earth, resulting in “100% of the money collected from the fossil fuel companies” being distributed uniformly to the public.
 
“The fee-and-dividend approach is straightforward,” argues Hansen. “It does not require a large bureaucracy. The total amount collected each month is divided equally among all legal adult residents of the country, with half shares for children, up to two children per family. This dividend is sent electronically to bank accounts, or for people without a bank account, to their debit card.”
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
How to Solve the Climate Problem (by James Hansen, The Nation)

Comments

John Coffee 14 years ago
While Dr. Hansen is not an economist, I do agree with his approach to curbing CO2 emissions through a fee-and-dividend approach. By keeping Wall Street out and main street in, there is actually hope that a reduction in CO2 emissions may occur. Most people would probably not protest against getting a check in the mail or a payroll tax-reduction, which makes an increase in the cost of fossil fuel energy more palatable.

Leave a comment