Why is U.S. Still Importing Asbestos?
Despite the link between cancer and asbestos exposure, the United States continues to import the toxic mineral into the country each year.
The dangers posed by asbestos have caused more than 50 countries to ban the substance, which is used in building materials, insulation, automobile brakes and other products.
But the U.S. government has not prohibited asbestos, preferring instead to regulate its use by businesses.
Linda Reinstein, who lost her husband to mesothelioma, a form of cancer tied to asbestos exposure, told The Center for Public Integrity that she’s “appalled and disgusted that the United States still allows the importation of asbestos to meet so-called manufacturing needs.”
“We’ve known for decades that safer substitutes exist,” added Reinstein, president of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization. “We’re facing a public health crisis where more than 30 Americans die every day from preventable, asbestos-caused diseases.”
So who’s using asbestos in the U.S.?
The chlorine-alkali industry, which makes chlorine and sodium hydroxide, use up about 57% of the mineral, while 41% goes into roofing products, according to the federal government.
To Learn More:
U.S. Asbestos Imports Condemned By Health Experts, Activists (by Jim Morris, Center for Public Integrity)
Asbestos (U.S. Geological Survey) (pdf)
Corporate Executives Sentenced to Prison for Asbestos Deaths: Could it Happen in U.S.? (by David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Justice Department to Ban Religious, Ethnic and Sexual Profiling by Federal Law Enforcement
- Big Tobacco’s Dire Health Warnings on E-Cigarette Packs Seen as Cynical Marketing Strategy
- Will Billing Rape Victims Thousands of Dollars for Medical Exams in Louisiana Finally Come to an End?
- Judicial Appointees of Obama and Clinton to Weigh in on Restrictive North Carolina Voting Law
- Amazon under Increasing Fire from Authors over Alleged Monopolistic E-Book Tactics