Obama First President Since Eisenhower to Win 51% of Vote Twice

Saturday, January 05, 2013

By winning the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama became the first candidate in more than 50 years to receive 51% of the popular vote twice.

 

With all ballots finally counted and certified, the tally from the November election revealed that Obama won 51.1% and Mitt Romney 47.2%. Four years ago, Obama received 52.9% of the vote.

 

The last president to take home 51% or more twice was Republican Dwight Eisenhower, in 1952 and 1956. The last Democrat to pull off this feat was Franklin D. Roosevelt.

 

Although George W. Bush was elected twice, he earned only 47.9% of the vote in 2000 and 50.7% in 2004. In fact, in 2000 he actually lost the popular vote to Al Gore by 543,895 votes.

 

Before Bush, Bill Clinton won 43.0% in 1992 and 49.2% in 1996. In both elections, independent candidate Ross Perot siphoned off a significant number of votes from the two major party candidates.

-David Wallechinsky, Noel Brinkerhoff

 

To Learn More:

Final Tally Shows Obama First Since ’56 to Win 51% Twice (by Greg Giroux, Bloomberg)

2012 National Popular Vote Tracker (David Wasserman @Redistrict)

47%...the Number that will Haunt Mitt Romney Forever (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)

Comments

L. M. O'Neal 11 years ago
Congrats. to the Prez., but, can someone, anyone, please explain how 100% of a precinct produce 120%, 130% or even 148% voter turnout in favor of Democrats. Seems to me if fair and honest election were held; that is paper ballots without black panters, Obama's percentage would have been considerably less. He may would have even lost the election. It looks more like he was appointed President for the second time, not elected President for the second time.
Russ 11 years ago
@Chico, 50.7 is not "statistically 51%", you're confusing "rounding up" with the much more complex concept of statistical significance. The larger your n size, the more important that 0.3% becomes. For example, if only 1,000 people voted this difference wouldn't be that important. But when we're talking about a few dozen million votes, that 0.3% becomes a very large difference.
Chico 11 years ago
What about the other two-term president since Eisenhower? I guess because Reagan won statistically 51% (50.7%) it'd make the silly point harder to back up. He also had a third-party candidate to content with, but was over 50% -- which is really the point you're trying to make. Try harder. I'm sure you can do better at punditry!
Robert E 11 years ago
Obama didn't win the election, the Republicans lost it. People vote for someone they can identify with. It is difficult to identify with someone making $400 million/year and pays less taxes on a percentage basis than you

Leave a comment