Government Accused of Allowing Bank of America to Investigate Itself about Foreclosures

Monday, October 15, 2012

Federal regulators have been accused of letting Bank of America (BofA) be heavily involved in a so-called independent review of foreclosure cases that’s supposed to correct the bank’s mistakes.

 

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which regulates financial institutions like BofA, began last year to evaluate millions of foreclosures by multiple banks from 2009 and 2010. The Independent Foreclosure Review was intended to keep the banks out of the decision-making process over whether homeowners should be compensated for institutional errors or illegal practices by only allowing them to provide information to an independent regulator. But the banks were allowed to choose their own regulator. Bank of America hired Promontory Financial Group, a company with which it had previously done business. No doubt Promontory would like to continue its business relationship with BofA…thus a potential conflict of interest.

 

When the homeowner files a complaint relating to a Bank of America foreclosure, BofA provides its version of the case to Promontory, which rejects to homeowner appeal or suggests a compensation amount. BofA is allowed to challenge the figure and Promontory may adjust it accordingly.

 

However, if the homeowner’s request is rejected or the homeowner objects to the amount of compensation, the homeowner is not allowed to challenge the figure. The homeowner’s only avenue for an appeal is to sue Bank of America. Given the resources available to the average foreclosed homeowner compared to the resources available to BofA, this is an unlikely avenue of appeal and one whose outcome is heavily skewed in favor of the bank.

 

According to an investigation by ProPublica, which gained access to internal bank memos and emails and talked to bank staffers, “The ultimate decision as to whether and how much a homeowner will be compensated is not made by Bank of America, the evidence shows, but is based largely on work that the bank itself performs. One current employee called that crucial judgment ‘only a matter of double checking’ the bank’s work.”

 

BofA “strongly” objected to ProPublica’s conclusions, and the OCC insisted the review was independent.

 

ProPublica shared its findings with Senator Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey), who chaired a congressional hearing on bank foreclosures. He told ProPublica that the memos “raise serious questions” about whether “consultants would be analyzing homeowner foreclosures completely independently of the Wall Street banks….If banks are trying to skew the results in their favor, regulators should stop that immediately.”

 

The Independent Foreclosure Review program sent out letters to 4.4 million homeowners giving them the opportunity to request a formal review. So far fewer than 250,000 homeowners have responded. In June the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report that criticized the letters for being difficult to understand.

 

Americans who feel they have been treated wrongly by Bank of America during the foreclosure or loan modification process have until December 31 to request a review. The appropriate forms can found here.

-David Wallechinsky, Noel Brinkerhoff

 

To Learn More:

Is BofA’s Foreclosure Review Really Independent? You Be the Judge (by Paul Kiel, ProPublica)

Bank of America Smacked with Foreclosure Fraud Lawsuits (by Matt Bewig, AllGov)

Bank of America Forecloses on Houses without Mortgages (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)

Comments

Mindy 4 years ago
We have been trying for the last 4 years to keep our home. We were finally approved for a modification and now our payment is $300+ more a month then it was before. They have violated more than 6 federal regulations. We are done with BOA. We will get our justice in court with them.
Priscilla 5 years ago
BOA should be held accountable for what they are doing. I think we need another lawsuit against they apparently have not learned from the first two. They are up to the same practices that they had endured in the first two lawsuits. We need a lawyer to sue them. Anyone game to take on the challenge? I am tire of the Corporate America practices of making homes affordable program when all BOA is doing is making homes unaffordable and putting people out of there homes.
kenneth 5 years ago
When I spoke to O.C.C. in Feb 2013, they informed me that two settlements had been reached, one for 55 billion dollars and another for 45 billion dollars. This is clearly FRAUD, the President, the O.C.C.,the banks, consultants, and the Treasury, all should be held accountable. Hey Jackass you must be one of the crooks.
jesse navarrette 6 years ago
BofA is adding back interest after my wife and I was approved for a home reduction program and now they want us to pay back interest and homeowners insurance coverage(which we have provided time and time again we have) on top of our mortgage and say that the goverment approved this. They said they were making our home affordable is nothing but a lie. A 88,000 home jump back to 173,000 dollar. Where is the justice? Thanks to the State Attorney of California for helping BofA screw homeowners and the all american dream of homeownership.
Sourdough Pretzel 6 years ago
Sure. We all know that there is no such thing as corruption in big business, especially not banking. There's never been a bank that took billions of dollars of government money and still went into debt, it's like an invisible forcefield of good intentions and well wishes.
Jack 6 years ago
Make the deadbeats pay what they owe and our banking system will be healthy.

Leave a comment