FDA Refuses to Ban BPA from Food Containers
Sunday, April 01, 2012
Just weeks after a landmark study found that even low dose exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals like bisphenol-A (BPA) produce significant, adverse health effects on people, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last week rejected a petition from environmentalists that would have banned BPA from all food and drink packaging, including plastic bottles and canned food.
Despite the new study of BPA, which FDA in 2010 said it had “some concern” over regarding its impact on the neurological and reproductive system of infants, babies and young children, FDA stuck to the position advanced by industry for several years now: that it needs compelling scientific evidence to justify new restrictions on BPA. The agency also objected to animal studies of BPA’s effects, saying those findings cannot be applied to humans, and that other studies were flawed for various reasons.
Canned food and plastic cup and bottle manufacturers have used BPA in the resin sealants that prevent contamination and spoiling since the 1950s, and the practice is approved by the FDA. Nevertheless, many scientists are concerned, especially in light of the fact that about 90 percent of Americans have in their bodies traces of BPA, which has been found in breast milk, saliva, urine, amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood. BPA has been associated with many health problems, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, insulin resistance, reproductive defects, diabetes and miscarriages.
The government is spending $30 million to conduct additional studies on BPA’s impact on humans, but not everyone is willing to wait for the Obama administration, which caved-in to industry lobbying on BPA in 2010. Eleven states, including most recently California, now prohibit the sale of baby bottles and sippy cups made with BPA, and some companies have removed BPA from their products, including Wal-Mart, Toys “R” Us, all six leading makers of baby bottles in the U.S., and Campbell’s Soup.
“The FDA is out-of-step with scientific and medical research,” Dr. Sarah Janssen, senior scientist for public health at the Natural Resources Defense Council told the Associated Press. “This illustrates the need for a major overhaul of how the government protects us against dangerous chemicals.”
To Learn More:
FDA Rejects Call to Ban BPA from Food Packaging (by Matthew Perrone, Associated Press)
FDA Keeps Toxic Plastic Chemical in Food, Infant Formula (Environmental Working Group)
Low Doses, Big Effects: Scientists Seek “Fundamental Changes” in Testing, Regulation of Hormone-Like Chemicals (by Marla Cone, Environmental Health News)
Can of Del Monte Green Beans Sets Toxic BPA Record (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
White House Delayed Regulation of Controversial Chemical after Meeting with Lobbyists (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Majority of Federal Appeals Court Judges Appointed by Democratic Presidents for First Time in more than 10 Years
- The Mysterious Case of the Obama Administration Claiming State-Secrets Privilege in a Private Defamation Lawsuit
- Obama Administration and EU Threaten Shutdown of ExxonMobil’s Drilling in Russian Arctic
- Fewer Workers Die on the Job…Except Latinos
- Is an Arkansas Republican Responsible for Spread of Ebola and did a Democrat Vote to Give Social Security Benefits to Illegal Immigrants? Of Course not…except in Campaign Ads