Is Space Solar the Solution to World Energy Problems?

Sunday, March 27, 2011
(graphic: NASA)
In light of recent energy-related disasters (the nuclear plant in Japan, the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico), advocates are calling for a new approach to generate electricity: space solar power.
 
First proposed in 1968 by Dr. Peter Glaser, the idea of capturing the sun’s energy in earth’s orbit and beaming it down to the surface seemed far-fetched for many years. But new advances in solar technology make space solar energy a more viable option to consider, proponents say.
 
Japan, currently suffering with its leaking nuclear power plant, is also leading the way among nations in developing the capability to harness solar energy using special satellites that collect the sun’s rays, convert it into electricity and transmit it to earth using microwave beams and rectify antennas.
 
Having already committed $21 billion to the project, Japan hopes by 2030 to begin harnessing one gigawatt of energy from space—the same amount that a large nuclear power plant can produce.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
The Race for Space Solar Energy (by William Cox, The Public Record)
About Space Solar Power (National Space Society)

Comments

Maury Markowitz 13 years ago
To answer the question in the title of this article: no, never. Space based solar will never, ever, be a solution to, well, anything. Why? Well it's very simple really. Follow along: A solar panel placed on the Earth will produce total energy Ea over lifetime Te, a value of Me The same solar panel placed in orbit will produce energy Es over lifetime Ts, a value of Ms It will cost Sa to "ship" the panel on Earth, and Ss to space. Maury's Razor: Ms-Me << Ss - Se. You are ALWAYS better off putting the panels in Earth. Example: A typical solar panel placed in the Nevada desert will produce about 350 kWh a year, and have a lifetime of about 25 years. At 10 cents for a kWh, that's about $875. The same panel in space will produce 5 times as much power in a year, but have a greatly shorter lifetime of about 12 years, and lose about 1/2 of the power in transmission. So it's lifetime value is $1,050 Shipping a panel to Nevada is about $1 a pound. Shipping to space is about $11,000 a pound. So as you can see $1050 - $ 875 << $11,000 - $1 I have played with these numbers every way you can imagine, it never works out for SPS. Period. No change in technology changes this, either. The ONLY thing that would make it work is if launch costs fall to about $10 a pound. That's less than air freight. Good luck.

Leave a comment