FTC Says 1 in 5 Americans Have at Least One Error on Their Credit Report
The FTC found that about 20% of consumers have an error on at least one of their three credit reports. The consumer credit rating business is dominated by three players: Experian, Equifax and TransUnion.
Federal regulators also found that 5% of consumers have credit-report errors that could result in them having to pay more for financial products, such as auto loans and insurance.
The FTC figures mean that tens of millions of credit reports may have errors, both significant and insignificant, according to John Ulzheimer, president of SmartCredit.com’s consumer education division. This increases the odds that any single person may have an error on one of their reports, he said.
“These are eye-opening numbers for American consumers,” Howard Shelanski, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Economics, said in a press release. “The results of this first-of-its-kind study make it clear that consumers should check their credit reports regularly. If they don’t, they are potentially putting their pocketbooks at risk.”
To Learn More:
Why Consumers’ Credit Reports Contain Errors (by Daniel Gross, Daily Beast)
FTC: Credit Reports May Have Significant Error (by Christine Dugas, USA Today)
Report to Congress Under Section 319 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003(Federal Trade Commission) (pdf)
FTC Attacks Fake “Free Credit Report” Ads (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Private Database of One-Third of U.S. Adults Sold to Debt Collectors and Banks (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- International Aid Group Blasts Pentagon for Shifting Stand on Afghan Hospital Air Assault
- As Always, U.S. Wastes Billions Funding Failed Foreign Military Forces
- School Books to Get Rewrite after Outcry over Slavery Whitewash
- Most of $20.8 Billion BP Penalty Is Tax Deductible as a Cost of Doing Business
- Federal Judge Rules “National Security” is too Vague to Justify Hiding Documents in Immigration Case