Supreme Court Rulings Open Loopholes for Water Polluters

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Thanks to a conservative shift in the U.S. Supreme Court, government regulators are now limited in enforcing the nation’s toughest water pollution law, a development that has put the drinking water of millions of Americans at risk.

 
An investigation by The New York Times found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is unable to go after some businesses that have dumped oil, carcinogens and dangerous bacteria into lakes, rivers and other waterways. An estimated 1,500 major pollution investigations have come to a halt in the last four years.
 
The reduced enforcement has occurred because of two rulings by the Supreme Court that reduced the scope of the Clean Water Act by redefining the term “navigable waters,” olid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (2001) and Rapanos v. United States (2006). Now, waterways that are entirely within one state, creeks that periodically dry up, and lakes unconnected to larger water systems are beyond the jurisdiction of federal regulators.
 
“We are, in essence, shutting down our Clean Water programs in some states,” said Douglas Mundrick, an EPA lawyer in Atlanta. “This is a huge step backward. When companies figure out the cops can’t operate, they start remembering how much cheaper it is to just dump stuff in a nearby creek.”
 
James Tierney, the New York State assistant commissioner for water resources, said entire watersheds that feed into New York City’s drinking water supply have been left unprotected by the actions of the high court.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Rulings Restrict Clean Water Act, Foiling E.P.A. (by Charles Duhigg and Janet Roberts, New York Times)

Comments

Josh 10 years ago
Wow, way to make a totally statist (aka federal government) argument. You act as if there's absolutely no environmental protection for them now. In reality, what's happened is the responsibility has simply been transferred to the states.

Leave a comment