Obama’s Fee on Big Finance: How It Would Work

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Telling the financial industry it’s time to meet its responsibilities and help cover the cost of the federal bailout, President Barack Obama this week unveiled his tax on big banks to recoup almost $100 billion in costs. The tax would last 10 years and raise at least $90 billion for the U.S. Treasury, according to the White House. President Obama also said the total cost to taxpayers from the bailout of Wall Street was $117 billion, indicating the tax may eventually recover this higher total and last longer than a decade if necessary.

 
The fee would be equal to 15 basis points of a company’s net liabilities, which is the equivalent of 15 hundredths of one percent of the amount of tax owed to the government minus tax credits.
 
Beginning in July, the proposed tax would apply to banks, thrifts and insurance companies—including those not rescued by Washington—with more than $50 billion in assets. About 50 financial institutions would have to pay the tax, although it is estimated that the 10 largest firms would likely account for 60% of the total revenue. Citigroup would face the highest annual tax bill ($2.2 billion), followed by JPMorgan Chase ($1.9 billion), Bank of America ($1.7 billion), Goldman Sachs ($1.1 billion) and Morgan Stanley ($992 million).
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Taxing Banks for the Bailout (by Jackie Calmes, New York Times)
Obama Gives Bank-Tax Details (by Cheyenne Hopkins, American Banker)

Comments

fastenix 14 years ago
I am all for taxing big financial companies. Although the CEO's threatened that tax might shift to consumers eventually. They are just bluffing. Because smaller financial companies are not taxed, the smaller companies will be more competitive and performing better among the big companies. So if the CEOs of big financial companies think taxing can hurt consumers, they are just idiots.

Leave a comment