Insurance Companies’ Involvement in Healthcare Web Site Fix Raises Conflict of Interest Issues
The Obama administration is increasingly looking to health insurance companies for help in fixing the flawed and much-maligned HealthCare.gov website—a decision that creates potential conflicts of interest.
If the government’s portal was working properly, Americans would be able to comparison shop among the plans available through the healthcare exchanges created under the Affordable Care Act (pdf). But with the website’s many hardware and software problems preventing people from signing up for insurance, the administration has called on insurers for technical help.
But as part of this decision, consumers may find themselves going directly to an insurance company’s website for information—and companies would not be required to tell visitors about other plans available through competitors.
“If insurers’ sites became a main way to buy coverage, it would undermine the side-by-side comparison shopping—as is used on travel Web sites such as Kayak—that HealthCare.gov is meant to promote,” Juliet Eilperin and Amy Goldstein wrote at The Washington Post. “That’s because individual insurers are not obligated to tell their customers about competing health plans available. They are required only to advise consumers that other plans exist and can be found on HealthCare.gov.”
Other problems may arise as well, according to consumer advocates.
“One key question is whether insurance company advertising will accurately reflect the benefits people can get from the Affordable Care Act or if they will attempt to use fear and uncertainty to push people into a particular plan to increase their profits at customers’ expense,” Eddie Vale, a strategist with Protect Your Care, an advocacy group that promotes the law, told the Post.
Like consumers, insurance companies are also unable to access certain data on the website, such as information that tells them if customers’ income qualifies them for government subsidies. The firms and the White House, whose representatives have been actively engaged in meetings, are seeking a way to solve that problem, if only on a temporary basis. The insurance companies are reportedly insisting on keeping any extra subsidy payments that are later discovered to have been accidentally paid to them.
To Learn More:
White House Relying More on Insurance Carriers to Help Fix Healthcare.Gov (by Juliet Eilperin and Amy Goldstein, Washington Post)
Health Insurance Companies Join HealthCare.gov Rescue Effort (by Jeffrey Young, Huffington Post)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Managing Director of the Council on Environmental Quality: Who Is Christy Goldfuss?
- Executive Director of the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships: Who Is Melissa Rogers?
- Principal Deputy Director of the United States Mint: Who Is Rhett Jeppson?
- Coordinator of the Bureau of International Information Programs: Who is Macon Phillips?
- Acting Under Secretary of the Veterans Benefits Administration: Who Is Tom Murphy?