Federal Judge Orders DEA to Release Information about Illegal Mass Surveillance
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been ordered by a federal judge to provide information on its secretive mass surveillance program to a human rights group.
Human Rights Watch (HRW), with legal help from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), sued the DEA and other federal agencies to stop the collecting of data on international phone calls made by Americans to overseas parties—a form of unauthorized surveillance that the DEA quietly performed for two decades, according to EFF.
The DEA conducted the mass surveillance without court approval, gathering billions of phone records on calls made to more than 100 countries, EFF’s Mark Rumold wrote. The DEA also shared its data with other federal agencies.
In response to the HRW lawsuit, a federal judge in Los Angeles ruled last week that the government must release information on the secretive program to the plaintiffs. “Friday’s decision is rare, and it’s a decisive victory—both for HRW and for the general public,” Rumold wrote. “EFF is not aware of any other case where discovery has been allowed into a government mass surveillance program. And the order forces the government to answer questions, under oath, about the steps it took to ensure that all illegally collected records have been fully purged from all government systems.”
The DEA claims it suspended the program two years ago, and on that basis asked for the case to be dismissed. Instead, EFF wants the court to rule the surveillance unconstitutional to ensure it is halted permanently and that any records collected from it are destroyed.
To Learn More:
In Lawsuit Challenging DEA Bulk Surveillance, Judge Gives Rare OK to Discovery (by Mark Rumold, Electronic Frontier Foundation)
Order Holding in Abeyance Ruling on Motion to Dismiss and Granting in Part Plaintiff's Request for Discovery (Electronic Frontier Foundation)
HRW v. DEA Complaint (Electronic Frontier Foundation)
Why is the DEA Conducting Mass License Plate Tracking and Why was it Allowed to Conduct Mass Surveillance of Americans’ Phones Records? (by Noel Brinkerhoff and Danny Biederman, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Cities across U.S. Prepare to Pay High Price for Resisting Trump Mass Deportations
- Only 1 in 4 Americans Want Health Care Law Repealed
- 9/11 Families Claim GOP Senators’ Proposal Will “Gut” New Law Allowing Them to Sue Saudi Arabia
- Conservation Groups Praise Wildlife Protection in Overhaul of Federal Land-Use Planning
- Federal Ethics Office Heaps Praise upon Trump for Agreeing to Divest Assets When He Didn’t