1% of Lawyers Filing Appeals to Supreme Court Account for 43% of Accepted Cases; Most Represent Corporations
Corporate America has learned that success in getting a case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court requires a particular lawyer belonging to an elite, though unofficial club.
Reuters found after reviewing nine years of high court cases that a very small group of attorneys has been representing a significant percentage of the legal battles heard by justices.
How small? Try 1%.
Only 66 of the 17,000 lawyers who petitioned the Supreme Court succeeded at getting their clients’ appeals heard 43% of the time, Reuters’ Joan Biskupic, Janet Roberts and John Shiffman reported.
“Their appeals were at least six times more likely to be accepted by the court than were all others filed by private lawyers during that period [2004-2012],” they wrote.
Most of the time these attorneys represent corporations seeking a victory before the Supreme Court. In fact, 51 of the 66 lawyers worked for law firms that primarily handle corporate clients.
“The results: a decided advantage for corporate America, and a growing insularity at the court,” according to the Reuters investigation. “Some legal experts contend that the reliance on a small cluster of specialists, most working on behalf of businesses, has turned the Supreme Court into an echo chamber – a place where an elite group of jurists embraces an elite group of lawyers who reinforce narrow views of how the law should be construed.”
The investigation also revealed that about half of the 66 lawyers clerked or worked for current or previous justices, “and some socialize with them.” In terms of diversity, there is little: Only eight of the 66 lawyers are women, and 66 of them are white.
To Learn More:
The Echo Chamber (by Joan Biskupic, Janet Roberts and John Shiffman, Reuters)
Elite Law Firms Spin Gold From A Rarefied Niche: Getting Cases Before The Supreme Court (by John Shiffman, Janet Roberts and Joan Biskupic, Reuters)
In An Ever-Clubbier Specialty Bar, 8 Men Have Become Supreme Court Confidants (by Janet Roberts, Joan Biskupic and John Shiffman, Reuters)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Victories against Voter ID Laws in the Courts Don’t Always Erase Voting Restrictions at the Polls
- Whistleblower Alleges Culture of Intimidation at Pentagon’s Contract Auditing Agency
- Pentagon’s Focus on Artificial Intelligence in Weaponry Portends Robot Arms Race
- Judge Orders ExxonMobil to Release Financial Records in Climate-Change Fraud Investigation
- Utah School System Sued for Abusive Policies toward Gay Students