VA to Review Confrontation with Reporter

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

A Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital in Washington, DC, was the site last week of a row between a college reporter and government officials that quickly escalated into a calls-to-arm by media organizations and First Amendment advocates. David Schultz, a radio reporter for American University, attended a public forum at the hospital for veterans to discuss their medical care, during which he tried to interview an Army veteran, Tommie Canady, off to the side. The hospital’s press officer, Gloria Hairston, intervened, insisting that Schultz—who apparently failed to identify himself earlier by checking in as media—and the veteran would have to sign consent forms before the interview could continue. Things then got ugly as security guards were called in and the sound card from Schultz’s digital recorder was confiscated. After Schultz retold the ordeal over the air at station WAMU and claimed the VA was trying to suppress the story of a veteran, media groups expressed their outrage in letters to the department.

 
But Larry Scott, a longtime journalist who now runs VAWatchdog.org, doesn’t think the matter was the VA’s fault. According to Scott, if Schultz had identified himself properly, as all reporters are required, and signed the consent forms (standard procedure), the incident never would have gotten out of hand. “As much as we love to hate our big, bad government bureaucracies, the VA is not the guilty party here,” wrote Scott on his website. “It is Mr. Schultz who is at fault..”
 
Nonetheless, the incident occurred at a public meeting. VA officials have agreed to return the confiscated equipment and launch an investigation into what happened.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
VA to Review Seizure of Reporter's Gear (by Ed O'Keefe, Washington Post)
Reporter in VA Scrap Had to Know Better (by Larry Scott, VAWatchdog.org)

Comments

Leave a comment