Supreme Court Decision on “Aged-Out” Immigrants Disrupts Normal Ideological Blocs
It is not often with the current U.S. Supreme Court that rulings create strange bedfellows between the liberal and conservative blocs of justices. But a recent ruling in an immigrants’ rights case did just that.
In Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio (pdf), a split court ruled 5-4 that children of immigrants cannot be given special priority by the immigration system just because they “age out” (meaning they turn 21 by the time bureaucrats get around to processing their parents’ visa application).
The case addressed a 2002 law adopted by Congress allowing aged-out children to hold on to their child status after turning 21.
Justice Elena Kagan, appointed by President Barack Obama, led the majority in deciding the law was ambiguous. “Whatever Congress might have meant,” Kagan wrote, “[the law] failed to speak clearly.”
One of the most surprising aspects of the ruling was who sided with Kagan, and who dissented. She was joined by three members of the court’s right wing (Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia, and Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.), along with liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The minority also featured an unusual mix of justices: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s other appointee to the court, as well as conservatives Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer also sided with them.
Some lawmakers and immigration groups criticized the court ruling, saying that in spite of the law’s seemingly vague or ambiguous language, the intent of Congress was clear.
The ruling has left aged-out children of immigrants “in limbo,” said Immigrant Rights Clinic co-director Alina Das, according to The New York Times, “waiting for leadership from the administration and Congress to make sure that they’re back on a path to citizenship.”
The decision is expected to affect thousands of aged-out individuals per year.
To Learn More:
Children ‘Aged Out’ of Immigration System Won’t Get Special Priority, Justices Rule (by James Barron, New York Times)
Woman Waits In Line For 21 Years To Immigrate Into US, Then Gets Turned Away For Being Too Old (by Nicole Flatow, ThinkProgress)
Scialabba v. Cuellar De Osorio (U.S. Supreme Court) (pdf)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Trump Choice for Labor Chief is Outspoken Critic of Worker Protections, Minimum Wage Increases
- Mass Deportations Damage U.S. Housing Market by Exacerbating Foreclosures
- Trump’s Cyberbullying of Union Boss Called “Dark and Disturbing” Assault on Right to Dissent
- Direct Link Seen Between Crime Rate and Interest Rates in U.S.
- Many Smartphone Health Apps Fail to Warn Users of Danger