Match.com Sued for Not Screening Out Convicted Sex Offender, Promises to Start Checking

Saturday, April 23, 2011
Match.com, the popular online dating website, has announced it will begin screening applicants against the national sex offender registry after it was sued by a woman claiming she was raped by someone she met through the service.
 
The new policy came only days after the lawsuit was filed by television producer Carole Markin.
 
Match.com President Mandy Ginsberg said her company had previously not used the sex offender registry to screen dating applicants because the database was considered to be unreliable.
 
The lawsuit demands that the court impose an injunction on Match.com to prevent it from accepting any new members until it installed a system to screen out rapists.
 
Markin says that she met Alan Paul Wurtzel twice, but on their second date he followed her home and attacked her. She searched his name online and discovered that Wurtzel has been convicted six times for sexual battery. He has pleaded not guilty to raping Markin. The trial is scheduled to begin on April 26.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Alleged Rape Victim Claims Match.com Put Her at Risk (by Matthew Heiler, On Point News)
Woman Sues Online Dating Site Over Alleged Sexual Assault (by Alexandra Zavis, Los Angeles Times)

Comments

LASIS_BLOG 13 years ago
legal as she is spoke, the legal journalism blog at new york law school weighs in on this topic: http://www.lasisblog.com/2011/04/22/are-online-dating-sites-liable-for-members%e2%80%99-safety/
Shelly Brown 13 years ago
how is the selling of girls on the street any different than match.com. at match.com the women are slightly older but they sell themselves for sex and charge men high priced dinners and drinks and then move on to the next man one after the other. many of the women on match.com have breakfast, lunch, dinner and afterwork drinks all day, each with a different man at each meal period. match.com pimps them out and the women treat the men like clients.

Leave a comment