Judge Slams Government Lawyers in Failed Whistleblower Case
Monday, August 01, 2011
Federal Judge Richard Bennett made it clear recently just how out-of-bounds the Obama administration was in going after former National Security Agency (NSA) official Thomas Drake for allegedly leaking classified information to the media.
During a July 15 sentencing hearing for Drake, Bennett harshly criticized the Department of Justice’s case that ultimately fell apart, but not before Drake’s life was devastated and he was subjected to a government-imposed tyranny.
The case began in 2007 when federal law enforcement raided Drake’s home looking for evidence of his giving secret documents to a reporter. But it was another two and a half years before Drake was indicted on 10 felony counts. His alleged crime was telling Siobhan Gorman, a reporter at the Baltimore Sun, about the NSA’s decision to reject a $3 million in-house program for collecting Internet and cell phone communications in favor of a $1.2 billion contractor-run alternative.
Then, in June, federal prosecutors dropped most of the charges, leading to Drake pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge of exceeding authorized use of a government computer.
Bennett sentenced him to a year of probation and 240 hours of community service.
But the judge saved the toughest punishment for prosecutor William Welch III, who insisted Drake be fined at least $50,000 to send a message to other whistleblowers. Welch also accused Drake of profiting from his ordeal by receiving a $10,000 prize as part of the Ridenhour award presented to him.
Bennett told the court: “There has been financial devastation wrought upon this defendant that far exceeds any fine that can be imposed by me. And I’m not going to add to that in any way.”
Welch also played a lead role in the bungled prosecution of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) on corruption charges.
The judge also rebuked the Justice Department for its handling of the case, especially when “on the eve of trial, in June of 2011, the government says, whoops, we dropped the whole case.”
By then Drake had gone through “four years of hell” that a citizen shouldn’t endure. “It was not proper. It doesn’t pass the smell test,” according to Bennett.
Handling of Drake Leak Case was “Unconscionable,” Court Said (by Steven Aftergood, Secrecy News)
Judge Blasts Prosecution of Alleged NSA Leaker (by Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post)
United States v. Thomas Drake (U.S. District Court, Maryland) (pdf)
Obama Anti-Whistleblower Case Collapses (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Obama Justice Dept. Tries to Block Unclassified Info from NSA Leaker Trial (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Obama Files More Anti-Leaker Cases in 2 Years than all Presidents in Last 40 Years (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Facebook Expands Political Footprint, Eyeing Major Role in 2016 Presidential Campaigns
- 50 Years since Passage of Voting Rights Act … and Birth of the Campaign to Reverse It
- U.S. Maneuver on Malaysia Human Rights Rating and Big Pharma Terms among Concerns in TPP Trade Talks
- To Bar Abortion, Alabama Appoints Lawyer for Fetus, Strips Incarcerated Mother of Parental Rights
- Bostonians Torn Over Olympics that Might Have Been: Deep Regret or Sigh of Relief?