Judge Rules Birth Control Shouldn’t Be Included in State Workers’ Insurance Policy
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A federal judge has ruled in favor of a Missouri lawmaker who cited religious objections while challenging the inclusion of birth control coverage in his government-provided health insurance.
The ruling Thursday by U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton addresses a section of President Barack Obama’s health care law that requires insurers to include coverage of contraception.
State Sen. Paul Wieland and his wife, Teresa, who are Roman Catholics, filed a lawsuit asserting it violates their religious beliefs to include contraception coverage in their state health insurance plan.
They cited the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says government shall not “substantially burden” religious rights unless by the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest.
The judge said the contraception coverage mandate violated that less-restrictive standard.
To Learn More:
Anti-Obamacare Legal Case is a Lawsuit in Search of Victims (by Danny Biederman and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Lead Plaintiff in Anti-Obamacare Lawsuit Now Bankrupt with Unpaid Medical Bills (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Concern over Militarization of U.S. Policy Arises from Trump’s Ceding Civilian Leadership Posts to Generals
- Rollout of Fake News Traced to Money-Hungry Teens in Macedonia Town
- Trump Claims His Support for Dakota Pipeline is Unrelated to His Stock Ownership in Project Participants
- Texas Imposes New Obstacles on Abortion Providers and Their Patients
- U.S. Congress Passes Bill to Bar Companies from Suing Customers Who Post Online Reviews