Judge Rules Birth Control Shouldn’t Be Included in State Workers’ Insurance Policy
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A federal judge has ruled in favor of a Missouri lawmaker who cited religious objections while challenging the inclusion of birth control coverage in his government-provided health insurance.
The ruling Thursday by U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton addresses a section of President Barack Obama’s health care law that requires insurers to include coverage of contraception.
State Sen. Paul Wieland and his wife, Teresa, who are Roman Catholics, filed a lawsuit asserting it violates their religious beliefs to include contraception coverage in their state health insurance plan.
They cited the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says government shall not “substantially burden” religious rights unless by the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest.
The judge said the contraception coverage mandate violated that less-restrictive standard.
To Learn More:
Anti-Obamacare Legal Case is a Lawsuit in Search of Victims (by Danny Biederman and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Lead Plaintiff in Anti-Obamacare Lawsuit Now Bankrupt with Unpaid Medical Bills (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- EPA Waited 7 Months Too Long to Declare Emergency in Flint Water Crisis, Claims Report
- Debate over Conspiracy as War Crime Casts Shadow across Guantánamo Detainee Conviction
- Most of Syrian Refugees Arriving in U.S. are Children
- Mexican Peso Taken on Wild Ride during U.S. Presidential Campaign
- Kansas Voter ID Requirement Violates Law, Rules Court