Judge Rules Birth Control Shouldn’t Be Included in State Workers’ Insurance Policy
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A federal judge has ruled in favor of a Missouri lawmaker who cited religious objections while challenging the inclusion of birth control coverage in his government-provided health insurance.
The ruling Thursday by U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton addresses a section of President Barack Obama’s health care law that requires insurers to include coverage of contraception.
State Sen. Paul Wieland and his wife, Teresa, who are Roman Catholics, filed a lawsuit asserting it violates their religious beliefs to include contraception coverage in their state health insurance plan.
They cited the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says government shall not “substantially burden” religious rights unless by the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest.
The judge said the contraception coverage mandate violated that less-restrictive standard.
To Learn More:
Anti-Obamacare Legal Case is a Lawsuit in Search of Victims (by Danny Biederman and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)
Lead Plaintiff in Anti-Obamacare Lawsuit Now Bankrupt with Unpaid Medical Bills (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
- Top Stories
- Unusual News
- Where is the Money Going?
- U.S. and the World
- Appointments and Resignations
- Latest News
- Acting Chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights: Who Is Patricia Timmons-Goodson?
- Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration: Who Is Scott Gottlieb?
- Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: Who Is Robert N. Davis?
- Chair of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Who Is Thomas Nides?
- Bears Under Fire in Florida