Federal Election Commission…The $67 Million Vanishing Government Agency

Friday, April 08, 2011
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) may soon be virtually leaderless due to a lack of nominees put forth by President Barack Obama and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
 
By the end of April, five of the FEC’s six commissioners will be gone because their terms will have expired. Obama is entitled to choose anyone he wants for the commission, although historically the commissioners have been split between three Democrats and three Republicans.
 
But Obama hasn’t even nominated his three, and McConnell hasn’t offered any names either. And even if the president were to appoint someone, their confirmation would be filibustered in the Senate.
 
In theory, the FEC performs important tasks. Its mission is to “prevent corruption in the Federal campaign process by administering, enforcing, and formulating policy with respect to Federal campaign finance statutes.” In February the FEC submitted a budget for FY 2012 that exceeded $67 million, most of which goes to pay the salaries of its 375 employees.
 
Government watchdog groups are beside themselves over the FEC being left in limbo. “Whether there is any constructive movement [at the FEC] is at the president’s doorstep,” Meredith McGehee, policy director at The Campaign Legal Center, said. “I don’t think that he can evade responsibility any longer. He’s got to make a choice of whether or not the rhetoric he believes in matches the inner workings of his government.”
 
The FEC has struggled to get anything done even before now, due to the 3-3 partisan split. This situation has allowed violators of federal campaign finance laws to go unpunished because of the commission’s inability to approve fines. The commission also has not moved to make changes in federal regulations in the wake of the landmark Citizens United case in which the U.S. Supreme Court threw out restrictions on campaign contributions by corporations and unions in federal elections.
 
Barring any action from Obama and McConnell, the six sitting commissioners will continue in their positions despite their terms having expired.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 

Comments

Scott Nelson 13 years ago
the statement near the top of this article that five of the six commissioners will be "gone" and that the agency will be "leaderless" is not just misleading, but downright wrong. as the article acknowledges in its last sentence, the commissioners will hold over notwithstanding the expiration of their terms until they are replaced. several of the commissioners already have been holding over despite the expiration of their terms for months or even years. the problem is not that the commission will soon lack commissioners, but that the holdover commissioners are so divided on partisan lines and in such fundamental disagreement over the legitimacy of the laws they are supposed to be enforcing that on many important issues they deadlock 3-3, resulting in inaction. replacement of the commissioners whose terms have expired with new commissioners who are willing to carry out the functions of the agency is imperative. otherwise, what will happen after the end of april will just be a continuation of what has gone before: the agency will continue to have 6 commissioners, but it will remain paralyzed.

Leave a comment