Long a crossroads of disparate cultures, trade and migration routes, Afghanistan is a mosaic of historical influences and civilizations. With an ethnically diverse population speaking at least 47 languages, the country is largely united by Islam, and defined by its history of regional power struggles. A seemingly remote territory, it has played a central role in the shaping of global events. In modern history, the country has been taken apart and put back together by decades of war and unrest.

 

In the late 20th century, Afghanistan was the site of a proxy war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which eventually left the country after years of fighting with U.S.-backed Mujahideen—which later regrouped under the regressive banner of the Taliban. The Taliban era ushered in what is considered one of the strictest and most repressive Islamist regimes in modern history. As part of its War on Terror offensive following September 11, 2001, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and toppled the Taliban regime. Despite the U.S. spending billions of dollars in an effort to institute a centralized democratic government, after seven years, widespread factionalism and insurgency continues. Additionally, the U.S. has poured billions into the country’s reconstruction plan–with, critics contend, a majority of contracts going to Washington insiders, and a high rate of failure.

 

Also fueled by instability in the post-war climate, is the country’s burgeoning opium industry—which supplies an estimated 90%-95% of the world’s heroin supply.

 

Lay of the Land: Afghanistan is located in west central Asia. The Hindu Kush and Pamir mountain ranges, which rise to 25,000 feet in places, divide the country into three watersheds: the Amu Darya (oxus) River basin along the northern border, the Indus headwaters in the east, and in the southwest, the Helmand River, which drains into an inland basin called the Seistan along the Afghanistan-Iran border. Winters in Afghanistan are cold and windy; summers are hot, dry, and often dusty.

 

Population: 32.7 million

 

Religions: Sunni Muslim 80%, Shi’a Muslim 19%, other 1%. (Figures are estimates, as a nationwide census has not been conducted in decades).

 

Ethnic Groups: Pashtun 42%, Tajik 27%, Hazara 9%, Uzbek 9%, Aimak 4%, Turkmen 3%, Baloch 2%, other 4%.

 

Languages: Eastern Farsi (official) 19.6%, Hazaragi 6.2%, Southern Uzbek 4.9%, Southern Pashto (official) 3.8%, Turkmen 1.8%, Aimaq 1.7%, Western Balochi 0.7%, Brahui 0.7%. There are 47 living languages in Afghanistan.

 

 

 

 

 

The first U.S. minister to Afghanistan was appointed in 1935, and the U.S. established its first official embassy in Kabul in the 1940s.

 

From 1950 to 1979, the U.S. provided more than $500 million in loans, grants and surplus agricultural commodities for development. As with other U.S. development and aid practices during the Cold War, these funds were aimed at a strategic development model–one that would bolster U.S. interests in regions that were thought susceptible to Soviet influence. Afghanistan was also part of the U.S.-backed Green Revoultion which, generally, diverted production from sustainable and local mechanisms towards high-yield production for export, introducing pesticides and uprooting local management and native farming techniques. Short-sighted and unsustainable agricultural production, argue critics, wreaked havoc on economy and environment alike. The Peace Corps was active in Afghanistan from 1962 and 1979.

 

Relations deteriorated after the 1978 Communist coup, and U.S. Ambassador Adolph Dub was murdered in Kabul the following year. The U.S. subsequently reduced bilateral aid, and then withdrew it altogether when the Soviets invaded in 1979. During the Cold War, the U.S. provided support for Afghan refugees in Pakistan, and spent $3 billion arming the Mujahideen against the Soviet regime. In 1989, the U.S. closed its embassy in Kabul. The U.S. reopened its embassy in 2001 when it invaded and occupied the country.

 

The U.S. and Afghan Tragedy (by Khushal Arsala and Stephen Zunes, Foreign Policy in Focus)

 

The U.S. continues to be the largest donor in the reconstruction of Afghanistan, funding military and infrastructure, and still has thousands of troops stationed there. President Hamid Karzai is strongly backed by the U.S. administration, and in 2005 the two countries signed a strategic partnership agreement, which reiterates Afghanistan’s support for and cooperation with U.S. military bases and counter-terrorism operations in exchange for continuing reconstruction and development aid. 

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2000, 53,709 Afghans lived in the U.S. However, according to the Afghani Embassy, estimates of the Afghan population in the U.S. are upwards of 300,000, with about 40,000 in or around the San Francisco Bay Area, about 20,000 in Northern Virginia, and another 10,000 scattered throughout Southern California. Smaller communities are also found in New York, Georgia, Oregon and Texas. Tajik and Pashtun are among the majority ethnicities, with Uzbek, Hazara, Jewish and Hindus among the minorities.

The Afghan Diaspora in the U.S. (Embassy of Afghanistan, Washington, D.C.)

 

Afghanistan’s chief exports include carpets, fruits and nuts, medical plants, animal products, cotton, gems and marbles. These products are generally exported to India, China, Pakistan, the U.A.E., Europe, the UK and the U.S.

Most years, Afghanistan exports only about $500 million worth of goods, compared with the $4.4 billion it imports. However, exports have seen a steady increase in the past few years.

 

In 2007, Afghan exports to the U.S. totaled more than $74 million. By far the highest value (in dollars) for 2007 was for “U.S. goods, returned or reimports” at nearly $65 million. Rugs followed at more than $3 million, steadily up in recent years. Artwork, which has accounted for around $2-$3 million in recent years, was back up after a drop in 2004 and 2005. And while crude oil was at $43 million in 2003, no crude was exported to the U.S. in subsequent years.

 

U.S. Exports to Afghanistan totaled $488.7 million in 2007, on a dramatic, gradual incline from only $60.7 million in 2003. Of this, passenger cars accounted for the highest dollar value, at $133 million, followed by military parts ($81.2 million) and telecom equipment ($42.6 million). Wheat, trucks, buses and special purpose vehicle exports were also significant, and chemicals, electrical equipment and computers were all around $10 million.

 

Top investor countries include Turkey, Pakistan, the U.S., China, U.A.E. and Iran, with investments totaling $2.4 billion (2003-2007).

 

In 2007 the U.S. gave a staggering $1.8 billion in aid to Afghanistan, including $819 million in supplementary funding. The budget allotted the most funding to Infrastructure ($560.1 million), Counter-Narcotics ($425.7 million), Good Governance ($205.8 million), Health ($114.7 million), and Conflict Mitigation and Reconciliation ($78.0 million). The 2008 budget estimate increased aid to $1.9million, including $839 in supplementary funds. Although the 2009 budget request will decrease aid to $1.1 billion, the final budget, including supplementary funding, may equal the sums of previous years. The 2009 budget will allot the most funding to Counter-Narcotics ($312.6 million), Infrastructure ($147.1 million), Good Governance ($105.0 million), and Political Competition and Consensus-Building ($93.0 million). The increases in Governing Justly and Democratically represent preparations for the 2009-2010 elections, while the decline in funding for Economic Growth can be traced to the completion of a number of major power and road projects.

US-Afghan Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) (PDF)

Congressional Budget for Foreign Operations (pages 539-543) (PDF)

Karzai: Afghanistan Underfunded (by Alex Johnson, MSNBC/Meet the Press)

Follow the Money: US Waste Money Rebuilding Afghanistan (Video report by Lara Logan, CBS)

Can Money Save Afghanistan? (by Aryn Baker, Time)

 

Troops in Contact: Airstrikes and Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan (Human Rights Watch)

Evidence Points to Civilian Toll in Afghan Raid (by Carlotta Gall, New York Times)

“Accidents” of War (Tom Englehardt, Tom Dispatch)

Controversy Surrounds Military Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan Following Civilian Casualties (by Dan Murphy, Christian Science Monitor)

Afghanistan: NATO Killing Stirs Controversy (by Breffni O’Rourke, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty)

 

A 2003 study by the Center for Public Integrity found that post-war contracting policies in Iraq and Afghanistan favored well-connected Bush Administration supporters. According to the report, more than 70 U.S. companies and individuals won up to $8 billion in contracts for work in the two countries between 2001 and 2003. Nearly 60% of the companies had employees or board members who either served in or had close ties with the highest levels of executive and legislative branches or the military. Further reports indicate that many of these contracts are granted with minimal oversight and quality assurance, meaning that U.S. corporations are profiting from incompetent and incomplete development projects that are responsible for further destabilizing the country.

Afghanistan, Inc. (by Fariba Nawa, Corp Watch) (PDF)

List of U.S. Contractors in Post-War Afghanistan (Center for Public Integrity)

Study finds cronyism in Iraq, Afghanistan contracts (by Bryan Bender, Boston Globe)

Afghan vote ends in controversy (BBC News)

 

Prior to the U.S. invasion, the Taliban regime was universally condemned by international observers for gross human rights violations, including summary executions, kidnapping, torture, child soldiers, and arbitrary arrests, not to mention suppression of freedoms of speech and expression, which were virtually obliterated under strict, prohibitive cultural directives.

Situation of human rights in Afghanistan (2001 UNHCR Report)

 

Current Human rights conditions can be described as “dire” in Afghanistan, where the average life expectancy for men and women is around 46 years old, and where, according to the U.N., one-third of inhabitants suffer from chronic food insecurity.

Afghanistan: Events of 2007 (Human Rights Watch)

 

Critics of the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan point consistently to a lack of resources, funding, troops and coordination among existing operatives. The 40,000 NATO and Coalition forces currently in the country, claim observers, are relatively few compared to deployments to other post-conflict zones, especially given the size and scope of reconstruction in Afghanistan. Initiatives or missions are often left unfinished or under-supported, in many cases leading to corruption, inefficiency and failure. NATO and Coalition forces are sometimes bound by national laws and restrictions that prevent them from adequately protecting the civilian population.

 

In addition to inefficiency, the U.S. has come under fire for its treatment of civilians. Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported that in 2007, NATO and U.S.-led Coalition forces killed at least 300 civilians. According to HRW, “The US military operates in Afghanistan without an adequate legal framework, such as a Status of Forces Agreement with the Afghan government, and continues to detain hundreds of Afghans without adequate legal process.”

 

Also in 2007, a U.S. Federal court sentenced CIA contractor David Passaro to eight-and-a-half years in prison after he was found guilty of assault in the 2003 beating death of Abdul Wali. Passaro was the first civilian to be charged with abusing a detainee in the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

Afghanistan has had the largest repatriation of refugees of any country in the last 30 years. According to the U.S. government, as of December 2007, approximately 3.5 million Afghans remained in neighboring countries. Between 2001 and 2007, the U.S. has provided more than $447.5 million in support to Afghan refugees, returnees, and other conflict victims.

 

Warlords and criminals continue to exert influence in Hamid Karzai’s government, and even hold seats in Parliament, where some have attempted to pass restrictive legislation curtailing freedoms of press and speech. Corruption and the lack of transparency have caused the Karzai government to lose credibility, and given way to further deterioration of stability and rule of law. Also, international observers point to the government’s use of secret prisons, and Afghanistan is implicated in U.S. extraordinary rendition operations.

 

The Taliban regime was notorious for insidious and endemic human rights abuses, and a particularly brutal treatment of women. Even after U.S. military forces ousted the Taliban in 2001, they continue to gather strength and have made a strong resurgence recently amid widespread instability.

 

The Taliban and other anti-government insurgent groups, including Islamists and tribal militias, criminal groups and local warlords (many of which have ties to government) continue to terrorize the civilian population and prevent peacekeeping and security forces from achieving their mission.

 

The reprisal of suicide bombings in 2007 killed nearly 400 civilians, a record number. The Taliban carried out 28 beheadings in the same year, many of them recorded and/or televised. Also in 2007, insurgent groups killed at least 34 aid workers, and the UN doubled its “most dangerous” areas (where personnel are not allowed to enter), now constituting a third of the country.

Taliban Resurgence (PRI The World)

Taliban ResurgenceStrains Alliance in Afghanistan (by Tom Bowman, NPR Morning Edition)

Time Is on the Taliban's Side (by Jason Motlagh, Asia Times)

The Taliban, Regrouped And Rearmed (by Peter Bergen, Washington Post)

Human Rights and the Taliban (Lorrne W. Craner, US State Department)

 

During their five-year rule of the country, the Taliban instituted a severe interpretation of Islamic law, coming down hard on all members of society, but particularly targeting women. The UNHCR condemned the regime for widespread discrimination, executions, trafficking, forced marriage, kidnappings and abductions targeting women. Women and girls were also kept out of public life, including schools and employment. Marginalized under Taliban rule, women made progress in government participation after the U.S. invasion, especially in 2005 parliamentary elections. However, discrimination against women and human rights violations continue, as the government is unable or unwilling to enforce the law.

U.S. Feminist Voice Post-Taliban Concerns (by Siobhan Benet, Women’s E News)

Taking Cover: Women in Post-TalibanAfghanistan (Human Rights Watch)

 

 

Debate over Afghanistan in the U.S. largely centers on whether or not the government should have authorized the 2001 invasion, how long troops should be stationed there, how the reconstruction efforts are carried out and funding. In light of recent Pentagon reports painting a bleak picture and citing deteriorating security conditions so many years after the invasion, at a time by which most thought infrastructure, political climate and security would have seen dramatic changes for the better, many U.S. citizens and politicians question the wisdom of U.S. policy in the country. Recent violence levels in Afghanistan have made Iraq look mild in comparison, drawing increasing attention to the debate from all sides.

 

Across partisan lines, a broad spectrum of politicians (including Barack Obama and John McCain) have at one point or another asked for an increase in troops. Many critics of the Bush administration claim that funds necessary to fight the War on Terror–and find Osama bin Laden, the government’s original target–have been diverted to Iraq, leaving important operations in Afghanistan under-funded. The partisan divide generally falls between moderate Democrats who want to pull troops out of Iraq and put more in Afghanistan, and Republicans who are committed to the current policy direction in Iraq.

 

If elected, Democratic presidential nominee Barak Obama says that he will withdraw thousands of troops from Iraq and send them to Afghanistan. Other lawmakers join him, as do many military leaders who have become disillusioned with Iraq as the U.S. is faced with failure in Afghanistan.

 

Republican presidential nominee John McCain, on the other hand, disagrees. As one of many Republicans still committed to the Bush Administration’s policy in Iraq, McCain is against pulling troops out of Iraq, instead suggesting NATO and Pakistan take on more responsibility in Afghanistan.

 

Obama’s Tour of Afghanistan Renews Debate About US Role (by Aunohit Mojumdar, Christian Science Monitor)

Obama, McCain split over Afghan strategy (by Bryan Bender, Boston Globe)

'The Insurgents Are not Winning in Afghanistan' (Der Spiegel interview with Brookings Institute’s Jeremy Shapiro)

 

Adolph Dubs, 1978-1979

Adolph Dubs, Russian expert and WWII veteran, was appointed U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan in 1978. Dubs was killed in an exchange of fire between Afghan troops and the Islamist extremists who had kidnapped him. The troops were reportedly attempting his rescue from the kidnappers, who demanded the release of prisoners. Critics in the U.S. claim that the killing was far from accidental, pointing to Soviet control of the Afghan forces at the time. The U.S. closed its Kabul embassy after the incident.

Adolph Dubs bio (Arlingtoncemetary.net)

 

 

Born in 1968 in Kabul, Hakimi graduated from Kabul’s Istiqlal High School in 1985, and earned a Master’s degree in Engineering at Kabul Polytechnic Institute in 1991. He joined the Ministry of Foreign Affairs the same year. By 1994 fighting in the Afghan Civil War had reached Kabul, and Hakimi, with his wife Sultana and two young daughters, used a brief lull in the fighting to leave for the United States and join his parents and siblings, who had immigrated to Orange County, California.

 

From 1995 to 1998, Hakimi studied at California State University at Long Beach. Even before receiving his diploma, Hakimi began working as an engineer for Liebert, a branch of the well-known American engineering firm Emerson.

 

Following the expulsion of the Taliban from Afghanistan in 2002, Hakimi decided to heed the call of the US-backed government of Hamid Karzai, which had invited all Afghan expatriates to join in the reconstruction of the country. Upon his return to Afghanistan, Hakimi served in the Ministry of Finance, the Independent Administrative Reform and Civil Service Commission, the office of the Vice President and other agencies in the fields of policy making, strategic planning, public sector reform and restructuring, capacity building and donor contribution.

 

In 2005, Hakimi received a major promotion, as he was appointed Ambassador of Afghanistan to China (and concurrently non-resident Ambassador to Mongolia and Vietnam). At that time, Hakimi was a naturalized U.S. citizen, however he renounced his citizenship in order to qualify as ambassador to China. He served until May 2009, when he was appointed Ambassador to Japan. He remained in Japan for less than a year, and was appointed Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs in spring 2010, and played a key role in finalizing negotiations for a major gas pipeline project through Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Turkmenistan.

 

In addition to his assignment as Ambassador to the United States, Hakimi is serving as Afghanistan’s non-resident envoy to Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina.

 

Hakimi is fluent in Dari and English, and is well-versed in Pashto, Urdu, and French. Hakimi and his wife Sultana, an engineer and U.S. citizen whom he met and married while both were at university in Kabul, have three daughters: Sameena, Sabiah and Zahra.

 

Hakimis Embody Afghanistan’s Past Success, Its Future Hope (by Gail Scott, Washington Diplomat)

Hakimi Meeting with U.S. Ambassador to Japan John Roos (WikiLeaks)