Only 26 of 363 U.S. Cities have Regained Jobs Lost in Great Recession

Saturday, January 21, 2012
Economic recovery is still a long way away for the vast majority of U.S. cities, according to a new report produced for city mayors and urban proponents.
 
Of the 363 metropolitan areas that lost jobs during the Great Recession, only 26 so far have returned to their previous employment level. By the end of this year, only 26 more are projected to reclaim all of their jobs.
 
And for the 80 cities impacted the most by the recession, it will take them at least five years to get back the jobs they lost.
 
Both Democratic and Republican mayors have criticized Congress for not doing more to help local communities get back on their feet.
 
“We’re looking for a partnership with the Congress to put America back to work,” Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a Democrat and president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, told The New York Times. “We’re looking for the Congress to do its job. If we were to grade the 112th Congress, I think you’d have to say the midterm report card grade would be very clear: an F for failure.”
 
Mayor Scott Smith of Mesa, Arizona, a Republican, echoed Villaraigosa's complaints, saying of federal lawmakers regarding the economy: "What have they done?"
-Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Few Cities Have Regained Jobs They Lost, Report Finds (by Michael Cooper, New York Times)

2012 Employment Forecast and the Impact of Exports (U.S. Conference of Mayors and the Council for the New American City) (pdf) 

Comments

anonymouse 12 years ago
unstated is the fact that while jobs may be regained, wages and benefits will not be; the once-unionized broom pusher on the factory floor who used to make $20 hour now does the same job for $10 hour. how is congress going to "fix" the simple fact that since 2001 average wages have fallen, according to a study by the harvard business school, 15 to 20 percent? political posturing is the only thing congress can do about a situation that's been building for 40 years. oh, wait, there is one thing they could do: declare war on somebody....but, of course, that's not really an option.... is it?

Leave a comment